BEHOLD, I COME QUICKLY;
(The Signs of Christ’s SOON coming)
Revelation 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
All of us who have been raised as Christians, have been hearing of the Lord’s soon return ever since we were children. In fact, as far back as the days of the apostle Paul there were some who were expecting the Lord to come in their day as we read in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
So is Christ’s coming near at hand or not? And if so, how do we know? How can we address those skeptics who say, “you’ve been saying that all your life and He still hasn’t come.” How can we prove that His coming TRULY IS at hand? The Lord gave us the answer to that by describing certain signs indicating His soon coming and we’re going to look at those to see if His coming actually is to be expected in our lifetime or not.
Let us first go to Luke 21: 25-27: 25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; 26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. 27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. What kind of signs in the sun and moon and stars did the Bible tell us there would be? We shall see that there are numerous verses both in the New and Old Testaments that tell us exactly just what those signs would be.
Let us first turn to Joel 3:15 - The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining.
Now let us go to Revelation 6:12,13: And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and 13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
Again, Isaiah 13:10 - For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.
Now Amos 8: 9: And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord GOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day:
Again, Ezekiel 32: 7 And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light. 8 All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord GOD.
Before we determine whether those predicted signs have taken place or not, there is something else that we need to know and that is, does the Bible also tell us just WHEN those signs in the sun, moon and stars would take place? It certainly does. Let us first go to Matthew 24: 29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: Now turn with me to Mark 13: 24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, 25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. 26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
Here we have two verses that mention those very same signs in the sun, moon and stars with the additional information that they would happen “after the tribulation.” What is the tribulation, when did it start and when did it end should be the next questions we need to know the answer to, right? Please turn with me to Daniel 7:25 – We read: And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
We’re not going to break this verse down into its components at this time because we’re studying about the signs of Christ’s coming. However, a detailed study reveals this verse, along with other verses in that same chapter of Daniel, tells us that the papacy would persecute God’s people for 1260 years, which began in 538 A.D. when the papacy was granted its power and ended in 1798 A.D. when the pope was taken captive by Napoleon and languished in prison until he died. Some of the cruelties and horrors that took place during that period of time when millions shed their blood for refusing to subject their conscience to a power other than God can be documented by such publications as “Fox’s Book of Martyrs.” But let us first look at this verse in Matthew 24: 22, And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. In other words, the Bible here tells us that the great tribulation would not extend all the way to 1798, but would be cut short before that. History records that the last martyrdom took place around 1776. We read in Revelation 6:12, that first a great earthquake would first take place, quickly followed by the signs in the heavens, which would occur AFTER the tribulation of the 1260 years cut short. Did that earthquake take place? We read from the annals of history:
Although not the strongest or most deadly earthquake in human history, the 1755 Lisbon earthquake's impact, not only on Portugal but on all of Europe, was profound and lasting. Depictions of the earthquake in art and literature can be found in several European countries, and these were produced and reproduced for centuries following the event, which came to be known as "The Great Lisbon Earthquake."
Lisbon had been shaken by several important earthquakes before November 1755: eight in the 14th century, five in the 16th century (including the 1531 earthquake that destroyed 1,500 houses, and the 1597 earthquake when three streets vanished), and three in the 17th century. During the 18th century, two earthquakes were reported in 1724 and 1750. In 1755, the earthquake struck on the morning of 1 November, the Catholic holiday of All Saints' Day when the churches were loaded with worshippers.
Contemporary reports state that the earthquake lasted between three-and-a-half and six minutes, causing gigantic fissures 15 ft wide to appear in the city centre. Survivors rushed to the open space of the docks for safety and watched as the water receded, revealing a sea floor littered by lost cargo and old shipwrecks. Approximately forty minutes after the earthquake, an enormous tsunami engulfed the harbour and downtown, rushing up the Tagus river. It was followed by two more waves. In the areas unaffected by the tsunami, fire quickly broke out, and flames raged for five days.
Lisbon was not the only Portuguese city affected by the catastrophe. Throughout the south of the country, destruction was rampant. A tsunami destroyed some coastal fortresses in the Southern Coastal area, and, in the lower levels, razed several houses. Most of the coastal towns and villages were heavily damaged. In Lagos, the waves reached the top of the city walls. The town of Vila Real de Santo António was destroyed by the tsunami. Other towns of different Portuguese regions, like Peniche, Cascais, and even Covilhã which is located near the Serra da Estrela mountain range in central inland Portugal, were affected. The shock waves of the earthquake were felt throughout Europe as far as Finland and North Africa. Tsunamis as tall as 66 ft swept the coast of North Africa, and struck Martinique and Barbados across the Atlantic. A ten-foot tsunami hit the southern English coast.
Of Lisbon's population of 275,000, as many as 90,000 were killed. Another 10,000 lost their lives in Morocco. Eighty-five percent of Lisbon's buildings were destroyed, including famous palaces and libraries, as well as most examples of Portugal's distinctive 16th-century Manueline architecture. Several buildings that had suffered little earthquake damage were destroyed by the subsequent fire. The new Opera House, opened just six months before (named the Phoenix Opera), burned to the ground. The Royal Ribeira Palace, which stood just beside the Tagus river in the modern square of Terreiro do Paço, was destroyed by the earthquake and tsunami. Inside, the 70,000-volume royal library as well as hundreds of works of art, including paintings by Titian, Rubens, and Correggio, were lost. The royal archives disappeared together with detailed historical records of explorations by Vasco da Gama and other early navigators. The earthquake also damaged major churches in Lisbon, namely the Lisbon Cathedral, the Basilicas of São Paulo, Santa Catarina, São Vicente de Fora, and the Misericordia Church. The Royal Hospital of All Saints (the largest public hospital at the time) in the Rossio square was consumed by fire and hundreds of patients burned to death. The tomb of national hero Nuno Álvares Pereira was also lost. Visitors to Lisbon may still walk the ruins of the Carmo Convent, which were preserved to remind Lisboners of the destruction.
So history records that the great earthquake DID take place just as the Bible stated it would, BEFORE the great tribulation ended––that earthquake happened in 1755. The last martyrdom took place in the year 1776, some 22 years before the power of the papacy was taken down, and as we have read from the Scriptures, the signs in the sun, moon and stars would take place AFTER that tribulation. Did it occur as the Bible stated it would or not?
Reading from a historical account of that day: On the 19th of May, 1780, (18 years before 1798, but AFTER the tribulation had ended!) this prophecy was fulfilled. It was not an eclipse. Timothy Dwight says, "The 19th of May, 1780, was a remarkable dark day. Candles were lighted in many houses; the birds were silent and disappeared, and the fowls retired to roost. ... A very general opinion prevailed, that the day of judgment was at hand." Quoted in Connecticut Historical Collections, compiled by John Warner Barber (2nd ed.; New Haven: Durrie & Peck and J.W. Barber, 1836) p. 403.
The Dark Day
"Almost if not altogether alone as the most mysterious and as yet unexplained phenomenon of its kind, . . . stands the dark day of May 19, 1780, --a most unaccountable darkening of the whole visible heavens and atmosphere in New England." That the darkness was not due to an eclipse is evident from the fact that the moon was then nearly full. It was not caused by clouds, or the thickness of the atmosphere, for in some localities where the darkness extended, the sky was so clear that the stars could be seen. Concerning the inability of science to assign a satisfactory cause for this manifestation, Herschel the astronomer declares: "The dark day in North America was one of those wonderful phenomena of nature which philosophy is at a loss to explain."
"The extent of the darkness was also very remarkable. It was observed at the most easterly regions of New England; westward, to the farthest part of Connecticut, and at Albany, N. Y.; to the southward, it was observed all along the sea coast; and to the north, as far as the American settlements extended. It probably far exceeded those boundaries, but the exact limits were never positively known. With regard to its duration, it continued in the neighborhood of Boston for at least fourteen or fifteen hours."
"The morning was clear and pleasant, but about eight o'clock there was observed an uncommon appearance in the sun. There were no clouds, but the air was thick, having a smoky appearance, and the sun shone with a pale, yellowish hue, but kept growing darker and darker, until it was hid from sight." There was "midnight darkness at noonday."
"The occurrence brought intense alarm and distress to multitudes of minds, as well as dismay to the whole brute creation, the fowls fleeing bewildered to their roosts, and the birds to their nests, and the cattle returning to their stalls." Frogs and night hawks began their notes. The cocks crew as at daybreak. Farmers were forced to leave their work in the fields. Business was generally suspended, and candles were lighted in the dwellings. "The Legislature of Connecticut was in session at Hartford, but being unable to transact business adjourned. Everything bore the appearance and gloom of night."
The intense darkness of the day was succeeded, an hour or two before evening, by a partially clear sky, and the sun appeared, though it was still obscured by the black, heavy mist. But "this interval was followed by a return of the obscuration with greater density, that rendered the first half of the night hideously dark beyond all former experience of the probable million of people who saw it. From soon after sunset until midnight, no ray of light from moon or star penetrated the vault above. It was pronounced 'the blackness of darkness!'" Said an eye-witness of the scene: "I could not help conceiving, at the time, that if every luminous body in the universe had been shrouded in impenetrable darkness, or struck out of existence, the darkness could not have been more complete." Though the moon that night rose to the full, "it had not the least effect to dispel the death-like shadows." After midnight the darkness disappeared, and the moon, when first visible, had the appearance of blood.
May 19, 1780, stands in history as "The Dark Day." Since the time of Moses, no period of darkness of equal density, extent, and duration has ever been recorded. The description of this event, is but an echo of the words of the Lord, recorded by the prophet Joel, twenty-five hundred years previous to their fulfillment: "The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come." Joel 2:31.
So here, from the chronicles of history we have the exact and precise fulfillment of those Biblical prophecies that told us that before Jesus comes, first there would be an earthquake––which happened in November 1755, then AFTER the tribulation ended––which happened in 1776, the sun would be darkened and that the moon would become as blood. That happened in May of 1780. But the Bible also states in Matthew 24:25 that the stars would fall. In fact, in Revelation 6:12,13 we read: And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; 13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
Did the stars of heaven fall as they are described here? What does history record? We read:
The great star shower took place on the night of November 13, 1833. It was so bright that a newspaper could be read on the street. One writer says, "For nearly four hours the sky was literally ablaze."* Men thought the end of the world had come. Look into this. It is most fascinating, and a sign of Christ's coming.
*Peter A. Millman, "The Falling of the Stars," The Telescope, 7 (May-June, 1940) 57.
Stars Fall From Heaven
In 1833, the last of the signs appeared which were promised by the Saviour as tokens of his second advent. Said Jesus, "The stars shall fall from heaven." Matt. 24:29. And John in the Revelation declared, as he beheld in vision the scenes that herald the day of God: "The stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig-tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind." Rev. 6:13. This prophecy received a striking and impressive fulfillment in the great meteoric shower of November 13, 1833. That was the most extensive and wonderful display of falling stars which has ever been recorded; "the whole firmament, over all the United States, being then, for hours, in fiery commotion.
No celestial phenomenon has ever occurred in this country, since its first settlement, which was viewed with such intense admiration by one class in the community, or such dread and alarm by another." "Its sublimity and awful beauty still linger in many minds. . . . Never did rain fall much thicker than the meteors fell toward the earth; east, west, north, and south, it was the same. In a word, the whole heavens seemed in motion. . . . The display, as described in Professor Silliman's journal, was seen all over North America. . . . From two o'clock until broad daylight, the sky being perfectly serene and cloudless, an incessant play of dazzlingly brilliant luminosities was kept up in the whole heavens."
"No language indeed can come up to the splendor of that magnificent display; no one who did not witness it can form an adequate conception of its glory. It seemed as if the whole starry heavens had congregated at one point near the zenith, and were simultaneously shooting forth, with the velocity of lightning, to every part of the horizon; and yet they were not exhausted--thousands swiftly followed in the track of thousands, as if created for the occasion." "A more correct picture of a fig-tree casting its figs when blown by a mighty wind, it is not possible to behold."
On the day following its appearance, Henry Dana Ward wrote thus of the wonderful phenomenon: "No philosopher or scholar has told or recorded an event, I suppose, like that of yesterday morning. A prophet eighteen hundred years ago foretold it exactly, if we will be at the trouble of understanding stars falling to mean falling stars, in the only sense in which it is possible to be literally true."
Thus was displayed the last of those signs of his coming, concerning which Jesus bade his disciples, "When ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors." Matt. 24:33. After these signs, John beheld, as the great event next impending, the heavens departing as a scroll, while the earth quaked, mountains and islands removed out of their places, and the wicked in terror sought to flee from the presence of the Son of man.
Many who witnessed the falling of the stars, looked upon it as a herald of the coming Judgment,--"an awful type, a sure forerunner, a merciful sign, of that great and dreadful day." Thus the attention of the people was directed to the fulfillment of prophecy, and many were led to give heed to the warning of the second advent.
So we have seen that the predicted signs in the heavens took place, not only exactly as they were described, but also at the time they were predicted to take place. This fulfillment in the very heavens can give us assurance that indeed the coming of Christ is near, even at the door. But what other signs do we have, after all the last of those signs occurred 175 years ago?
We read in Matthew 24:6-8 - 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. Certainly we cannot argue but the increase of these events is quite evident to us. Let us go on to Joel 3:11,12. Assemble yourselves, and come, all ye heathen, and gather yourselves together round about: thither cause thy mighty ones to come down, O LORD. 12 Let the heathen be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about. Is this not an accurate portrayal of the Muslim hordes that are waking up and threatening and striving for world conquest at this time? Isn’t it assuring to know that God predicted this thousands of years ago and that He is in total control of all the events taking place?
Please go with me to Isaiah 8: 9 Associate yourselves, O ye people, and ye shall be broken in pieces; and give ear, all ye of far countries: gird yourselves, and ye shall be broken in pieces; gird yourselves, and ye shall be broken in pieces.10 Take counsel together and it shall come to naught; speak the word, and it shall not stand: for God is with us. 11 For the LORD spoke thus to me with a strong hand, and instructed me that I should not walk in the way of this people, saying, 12 Say ye not, A confederacy, to all them to whom this people shall say, A confederacy; neither fear ye their fear, nor be afraid. 13 Sanctify the LORD of hosts himself; and let him be your fear, and let him be your dread.
Even though there will be trusts and alliances and affiliations and confederacies formed between nations and countries and political parties and even churches and denominations, they will not hold, it will all be in vain, and we should not seek to take refuge in those but let God be our refuge. In Revelation 18 one of God’s last messages consists of a call to His people to come out of all of these religious alliances lest they be partakers of the seven last plagues prepared for them.
For another sign let us turn to James 5: 1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. 2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth-eaten. 3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.
Psalm 49:11, Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names.
James 5:4 tells us: Behold, the hire of the laborers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth.
Certainly we can see that how greed today is grinding down the helpless. We witness that the wealthy will never be satisfied with the riches that they have accumulated by fraud and deceit and they believe that by their wealth they are setting up eternal empires, but some day soon those riches will eat their flesh like fire. Their exploitation of the poor and helpless is not going unnoticed by our Lord.
What are some other signs that the Bible tells us of the end times? Let us go to Nahum 2: 4 The chariots shall rage in the streets, they shall jostle one against another in the broad ways: they shall seem like torches, they shall run like the lightnings. The prophet here is describing a view of automobiles rushing to and fro. Certainly something that is familiar to all, especially to those who live in any large, crowded city.
Another sign: Isaiah 8: 19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? Now Revelation 16: 13-15, 13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. 14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
Here in these verses we see that spiritualism will increase more and more, even in the very churches that claim to follow God. For example, how many suicides and even murders have been committed because someone has been convinced from the pulpit that a better life exists on the other side of death, that when someone dies they immediately go to “be with the Lord?” From the pulpit multitudes are taught that death is a blessing from God, His method of obtaining souls for His kingdom, rather than a curse from Satan who was a murderer from the beginning (John 8:44). Certainly we know that that is true of our day today as they deny that death is but a temporary sleep, as the Bible teaches (Psalms 13:3; 1 Cor. 15:51; John 11:11-14 etc.), and insist that the soul is immortal, as the devil teaches (Genesis 3:4). Let’s look at a few more signs of the soon coming of Jesus.
Matthew 24: 23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 25 Behold, I have told you before. 26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Christ is not only warning us of false prophets who bring false messages and heretical winds of doctrine, but also warning us about those who will come claiming to be Christ Himself. There are a few individuals out there right now who claim to be the Messiah, and they are deceiving many.
Again, Isaiah 22: 12 And in that day did the Lord GOD of hosts call to weeping, and to mourning, and to baldness, and to girding with sackcloth: 13 And behold joy and gladness, slaying oxen, and killing sheep, eating flesh, and drinking wine: let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we shall die. 14 And it was revealed in mine ears by the LORD of hosts, Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye die, saith the Lord GOD of hosts.
Matthew 24: 37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Instead of working out their salvation with fear and trembling, most of the Christian world is celebrating and rejoicing in the presumptuous confidence that they are already saved and have immortal life while the fires of eternal destruction are awaiting them. (See Matt. 24:13; Rev. 3:11; Romans 2:7 etc.)
Going on, 1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; We are eye witnesses to these things happening right in our midst with such heresies as that Jesus was created by the Father and that there is no Holy Spirit––certainly doctrines of devils and seducing spirits in these latter times are all about us.
Again, 2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. Certainly we ARE living in perilous times. Let us now look at this Bible list of 19 sins that will predominate in these last days:
Verses 2-5, For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers (nothing pertaining to God is sacred anymore, it is all subject to ridicule and mockery), disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (its nothing remarkable now for mothers to calmly and deliberately murder their own babies and children––both before and after birth), trucebreakers (a man’s word and a handshake are no longer of any value), false accusers, incontinent (no self control––“there’s no right or wrong, just do what you want, whatever pleases you”), fierce, despisers of those that are good (those who stand for what is good and decent and moral and sacred are accused of being hateful and intolerant), 4 Traitors, heady (headstrong and domineering), highminded (arrogant and proud), lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God (You can fill a stadium to overflowing with sport and celebrity seekers, and the churches with those seeking to be entertained and emotionally excited, but how few pews are filled to hear eternal, life-saving truth on God’s Sabbath day?); 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
In closing, let us look at a couple of more signs that tell us that Christ is near, even at the door. Daniel 12:9,10 9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. These verses tell us that the prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation will be more fully understood in the last days, as we read from Prophets and Kings, 547, 548:
“As we near the close of this world's history, the prophecies recorded by Daniel demand our special attention, as they relate to the very time in which we are living. With them should be linked the teachings of the last book of the New Testament Scriptures. Satan has led many to believe that the prophetic portions of the writings of Daniel and of John the revelator cannot be understood. But the promise is plain that special blessing will accompany the study of these prophecies. "The wise shall understand" (verse 10), was spoken of the visions of Daniel that were to be unsealed in the latter days; and of the revelation that Christ gave to His servant John for the guidance of God's people all through the centuries, the promise is, ‘Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein.’ Revelation 1:3.”
God’s remnant, Adventist people have been blessed by the understanding that the Lord is giving us of the books of Daniel and the Revelation that sadly, many are rejecting as heresy, stating that all the books of Daniel have been fulfilled and there is no future application, when this inspired statement tells us just the opposite, that those prophecies are to be unsealed in the latter days.
There is one more sign that has to be fulfilled before Jesus comes back again, and we touched upon it in a previously read Scripture, 2 Thessalonians 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Now verses 3 and 4: 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.
Events swirling around us today shout that this very revealing is in process of happening right now. In fact, we are privileged and blessed to have a part in this revealing as we witness from the Scriptures and history that the Pope whom all the world is looking to as the hope for mankind, the man of peace, is actually the man of sin, the son of perdition, one of the last signs given of the soon coming of our Lord and Saviour in the clouds of glory.
Let us close with Joel 3: 16 The LORD also shall roar out of Zion, and utter His voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake: but the LORD will be the hope of His people, and the strength of the children of Israel.
No matter how troublous the times become, how threatening and dark, the Lord will be the hope of His people and the strength of Israel.
May we all be faithful and let no man take our crown of eternal life, is my prayer.
Clarence Settle
Where Did Allah Come From?
by Robert A. Morey
© 1996 Research and Education Foundation
Muslims worship a god by the name of Allah. They also give him ninety-nine other names. The question that naturally arises is who or what is this Allah? Where did the Muslims derive their ideas of Allah's nature and attributes?
Historical Source of Islam
Historians, linguists, and archeologists have dug into this question for over a century. Various archeological digs in Arabia and throughout the Middle East have uncovered the answer: Islam is a modern version of the ancient fertility religion of the moon god. Once this is grasped, the rise and history of Islam becomes clear.
The Arab conquests were made possible because the central powers in the Middle East had exhausted themselves in wars against each other. They were not able to fight off wave after wave of Arab armies which subdued entire nations with merciless slaughter, rape and plunder.
Conquering Armies
The Arabs destroyed some of the wonders of the ancient world such as the world famous library in Alexandria, Egypt, They destroyed many ancient churches and synagogues. Anthropologists have recorded how the Arabs destroyed the cultural heritage of any nation which fell under their sword.
Who were these Arabs? They obviously were not Christians because they destroyed churches and murdered priests wherever they went. Obviously, they were not Jews because they persecuted Jews without pity. This is seen today in their hatred of Israel and the many wars and acts of terrorism waged against Jews throughout the world.
If the Arab hordes which swept over the ancient world were not Christians or Jews, then what were they? They were pagans who worshipped a pagan god called Allah and followed pagan rites which were practiced in Arabia long before the religion of Islam evolved.
Islam Denies the Trinity
These facts of history reveal that Islam does not worship the same God worshipped by Christians. Why?
Christians worship one God in three persons: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. But Islam denies the Holy Trinity and worships a different deity called Allah who is not a Father and who has no son.
Since the religion found in the Bible teaches the Trinity, then it does not take a Ph.D. to see that Islam did not come from the Bible. Thus it is not the religion of the biblical prophets, apostles or Jesus.
Pagan Origins
Islam's origins have been traced back by scholars to the ancient fertility religion of the worship of the moon god which was always the dominant religion of Arabia. The moon god was worshipped by praying toward Mecca several times a day, making an annual pilgrimage to the Kabah which was a temple of the moon god, running around the Kabah seven times, caressing an idol of a black stone set in the wall of the Kabah, running between two hills, making animal sacrifices, gathering on Fridays for prayers, giving alms to the poor, etc.. These were pagan rites practiced by the Arabs long before Muhammad was born.
The Crescent Moon
What religion today practices the pagan rites of the moon god? Islam! This explains why the crescent moon is the symbol of Islam. It is placed on top of mosques and minarets and displayed on hats, flags, rugs, amulets and even jewelry. Every time you see the Muslim symbol of a crescent moon, you are seeing the ancient symbol of the moon god.
Denial Not a Refuge
Does the average Muslim know that he is worshipping a moon god? No. Does he know why the crescent moon symbol sits on top of his mosque? No. Is he shocked and perhaps angered at these facts of history? Yes. But can mere denial or angry threats refute the fact that Islam is nothing more than a modern version of the ancient religion of the moon god Allah? No. The average Muslim has been kept in the dark by the Mullahs and Imams who would lose their power if the truth ever got out.
03/28/08
To Allen Stump and Onycha Holt: (Editors – “Old Paths” Smyrna Ministries)
This letter is in response to your recent article “The Divinity of Christ.” First of all I notice that you adroitly fail to make the distinction between Christ’s PRE-incarnate nature and His POST-incarnate nature. In fact, you apply His POST-incarnate nature to every reference you make of Him––but more on this later. Also, I find it interesting and revealing that you find it necessary to go outside of the Bible to support your arguments. For example, you state, regarding Christ, “…he is not ‘the God’ in the sense of being the Supreme Being of the universe.”
Where in the Bible does it state that the Father Himself is the “Supreme Being of the universe”? You also state (ask), “…does the Bible teach us that Jesus is Very God of Very God?” No, it does not, neither does it say that of the Father, for that term is found nowhere in Scripture neither! A very clever way of turning an argument in your favor but seen to be totally without Scriptural support for those who look into this matter sincerely. Isaiah 8:20, as you know, tells us: “To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” By using terms and descriptions NOT found in Scripture you violate every principle of this divine standard of truth and place yourselves in the very same category of those who uphold such false teachings as the “Secret Rapture” and “immortality of the soul”–––terms not supported by Scripture either, which have led untold souls to destruction, but let us go on.
You stated: “Isaiah says that ‘his name shall be called…the mighty God.’ Some people understand this phrase to mean that Christ is the Supreme God, and this might be true if the verse had referred to Christ as the Almighty God, but it uses the term mighty God.”
You are alluding that Christ is NOT Almighty God by this statement, but let me refer you to John 8:58: “Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.” The Pharisees well knew what Jesus was referring to that’s why they sought to kill Him. They well knew that He was referring them to Exodus chapter 3 and claiming ALL the titles and attributes of deity mentioned there, up to and including Exodus 6: 2,3 which, contrary to your erroneous conclusion about Isaiah 9:6, states: “And God spoke unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD: 3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.” And this statement from inspiration totally supports this fact: “The name of God, given to Moses to express the idea of the eternal presence, had been claimed as His own by this Galilean Rabbi. He had announced Himself to be the self-existent One, He who had been promised to Israel, "whose goings forth have been from of old, from the days of eternity." Micah 5:2, margin.” --The Desire of Ages, pp. 469, 470
To deny that those terms DO apply to Christ is to reject the true understanding of John 8:58 by denying His PRE-incarnate nature, and thus to deny and reject the Holy Word of God! My question to you is if you truly are seeking to promote truth, then why don’t you ever mention that verse and these inspired SOP statements?
Paul, as you well know, tells us in Philippians 2:6, “Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:” Equal means the same as, not lesser than. Two plus two equals, or is the same as four, not three or anything less than four. The Bible is very clear, simple and easy to understand in this instance. 1 Timothy 3:16 tells us, “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God (not a lesser “god,” not a subordinate “god,” not even a Jehovah Witness “a god,” but GOD!) was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.” Yet you continue to insist that Christ is ONLY a “lesser god” who at one time did not exist and was brought into existence by the Father and then “endowed” with full divinity, and thus never was nor can be TRULY equal with the Father, despite the fact that the Bible CLEARLY states otherwise!
Now I will show you both from the Bible and the Spirit of Prophecy that there will come a time when He will once again regain that equality with the Father. We read from MR 77, 1899: “Not until the fullness of the time shall come will the crucified and risen Saviour assume His equality with God. Patiently He has waited in the heavenly courts in behalf of His people who have suffered for their loyalty to Him. Patiently He waits for the gospel of the kingdom to be preached to all parts of the world until all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people have received the light of God’s word.” Manuscript 77, 1899 And we see that this indeed will be the case as we read of the saints singing directly to and about Jesus Christ in Revelation 15:3 “And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.” So your teaching that nowhere is Christ called God Almighty is utterly false. The result of your “doctrine” being based on just one Scriptural reference!
And here are some more collaborating SOP statements that go directly against your teachings:
“Jehovah is the name given to Christ. "Behold, God is my salvation," writes the prophet Isaiah; "I will trust, and not be afraid; for the Lord Jehovah is my strength and my song; He also is become my salvation. Therefore with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation. And in that day ye shall say, Praise the Lord, call upon His name, declare His doings among the people, make mention that His name is exalted." "In that day shall this song be sung in the land of Judah: We have a strong city; salvation will God appoint for walls and bulwarks. Open ye the gates, that the righteous nation which keepeth the truth may enter in. Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on Thee, because he trusteth in Thee. Trust ye in the Lord forever; for in the Lord Jehovah is everlasting strength."--The Signs of the Times, May 3, 1899, p. 2.
Again here Christ Himself is referred to as Jehovah, in harmony with Exodus 6:3: “The heavenly gates are again to be lifted up, and with ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands of holy ones, our Saviour will come forth as King of Kings and Lord of lords. Jehovah Immanuel "shall be King over all the earth; in that day shall there be one Lord, and His name one."--Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing, p. 160.
You attempt to use those verses in Proverbs 8 to “prove” that at one time Christ did not exist and was “brought forth” by (or from) the Father. Again, totally ignoring the grammar. You use verse 22 for example. Totally ignoring that it plainly states “The Lord possessed me in the beginning of HIS way...” not “MY way,” which would then lend support to your belief. Also, looking at verse 30 it states: “Then I was by Him, as one brought up WITH Him: and I was daily His delight, rejoicing always before Him;”
You, once again, fail to make the distinction between “brought up WITH Him,” as opposed to “brought up BY Him,” which would support your argument. I.e. “I was brought up BY my parents, but I was raised WITH my siblings.” Quite a significant difference, but there is a direct, in your face, Biblical verse that totally destroys your argument that at one time only the Father existed and then He “brought forth, formed, produced, etc., etc,” the Son. Let us go to Isaiah 43:10 where there we read: “Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: BEFORE ME THERE WAS NO GOD FORMED, NEITHER SHALL THERE BE AFTER ME.” Just as Jesus said “before Abraham was I AM” so here God plainly, clearly, unmistakably, irrefutably states “NO GOD FORMED…” Isn’t this plain enough for you? It is for me.
Again, you state that Jesus Christ “…has been given all the attributes of God except immortality, for the Father alone is inherently immortal…” It truly boggles my mind that you dare to claim to believe in and attempt to use the SOP while denying the clear and plain statement which tells us: “...Jesus declared, ‘I am the resurrection, and the life.’ In Christ is life, ORIGINAL, UNBORROWED, UNDERIVED. ‘He that hath the Son hath life.’ I John 5:12. The divinity of Christ is the believer’s assurance of eternal life.” 7BC:438.
Just in case you have any questions as to what those capitalized terms mean, here are the definitions from Webster’s 1828 dictionary, the dictionary that was in use during Ellen White’s time :
Can it have been explained any clearer and more unmistakably than these multiple words expressed by the Lord’s Messenger under inspiration of the Holy Spirit?
In closing let me share an observation I have made that you undoubtedly will not care for but which cannot be gainsaid: There is ONLY one thing that the Roman Catholics, the Jehovah Witnesses, the Mormons, the Muslims, the Spiritualist New Agers, the New Corrupt Bible versions, and you “godhood” folks have in common. You ALL seek to diminish the deity of Jesus Christ. I call that Satan’s signature, and it winds its venomous, misleading way through every one of the above-mentioned dogmas and canons.
But sadly, I will now close knowing deep in my heart that all the arguments and Biblical and Spirit of Prophecy statements and evidence will not convince you of this false wind of doctrine you are promulgating, for you, in your denial of the personhood of the Holy Spirit, have closed your heart to the entrance of truth for we read in 1Corinthians 12:3 “Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.”
And again, we read from The Great Controversy, p. 524: “If men reject the testimony of the inspired Scriptures concerning the deity of Christ, it is in vain to argue the point with them; for no argument, however conclusive, could convince them. "The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." 1 Corinthians 2:14. None who hold this error can have a true conception of the character or the mission of Christ, or of the great plan of God for man's redemption.”
With deep Christian concern for you, and for the souls you are leading into deception.
You ask “When did the original Christian church begin to err or teach error?” I do not believe that anyone can with any great degree of certainty, pinpoint the exact time and place when error began to creep into the church, but Paul in Acts 20:29 warned: For I know this, that after my departing shall grevious wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. He also warned in 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 about false apostles, and deceitful workers, and many other warnings did he give throughout his writings. Also in Jude 4, he reiterated, in apparent fulfillment of Paul’s warnings: For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
This certainly fits the description of what happened with the Christian church at Rome and how it became a fountainhead of falsehood that has affected every other Christian church on earth. Perhaps the following study will give you additional insights into how some of the many errors came into the early church.
WAS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BUILT ON PETER
Catholicism states that the Roman Catholic Church is the only Church that has survived with continuity since Apostolic and Biblical times. Thus, this is testament, they insist, of divine intervention from God. And only the Catholic Church can trace its lineage back to St. Peter himself whom Christ established His Church upon, based on Matthew 16:18 as their “proof.” And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
And here is their explanation of that verse: “If you have been fed the misinformation that Jesus is contrasting Peter to the rock, by the rendering of the word rock as Petros, Peter’s new name, which protestants claim to only mean small rock in Greek––as opposed to Petra, with protestants think only to mean massive rock [they were actually synonyms in 1st century Greek] ––think again. Jesus SPOKE Aramaic and in His language He was COMPARING Peter to the rock, a term generally reserved for God. The reason we encounter this problem is because Greek and Aramaic have different grammatical structures. In Greek you have a problem arising from the fact that nouns take different gender endings. Hence, since the word Petra in Greek is feminine, it would have been inappropriate to give a man a feminine name, so it was changed to Petros––an imperfect rendering of the Aramaic. (www.catholic.com/library/Peter the Rock) This verse is clear in its message, mainly the establishment of Christ’s visible, infallible Church.”
Is this strongly held belief accurate and irrefutable? We will not directly address the issue of the definition of “rock” for it’s apparent that their reasoning will not allow them to accept our interpretation to the contrary, however, let us address it scripturally, by first going to Eph 2:19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
Verse 20 clearly states that the household of God, or in other words, the church, is built upon the foundation of the apostles, and the prophets and it is Jesus Himself who is the chief corner stone, not Peter. And that is the rock upon which Christ told Peter He would build His church. But they will not accept that because they “KNOW” that Peter started the church in Rome––after all, their Roman Catholic Church stands on this teaching, so let us take a very close look at that.
It is a rather startling fact that both secular and Biblical history contains scant evidence that the Apostle Peter was in Rome. Let us look at some of the many purely Biblical proofs that the Apostle Peter was never a significant religious influence in Rome, and that he clearly was never in charge of the Christian church in that Gentile city. Here are just a few:
BIBLICAL FACT 1. In 1 Peter 5:13 he wrote: The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son. There is this little Biblical evidence to support the idea that Peter ever labored in literal Babylon. It is known however, that early Christians often used the cryptic title “Babylon” when speaking of the Roman capital to avoid political reprisals. There is general agreement among commentators that Peter here uses the term “Babylon” for a veiled reference to Rome. This is the only Biblical reference that places Peter in Rome, though tradition does locate his closing labors and subsequent imprisonment and violent death there. So right off we see that though Peter may very well have been in Rome, biblically speaking, the record shows nothing of his church activities there. Incidentally, the Biblical record shows, despite papal custom to the contrary, that Peter was married, as we read in Matthew 8:14 And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, He saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever.
BIBLICAL FACT 2. When certain Jews from Judea agitated the question of circumcision and other matters regarding the Gentiles, Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other responsible men of Antioch, to Jerusalem to lay the matter before the apostles and elders. The apostle James, not Peter, presided at the Council, and his was the final decision that ended the discussion (See Acts 15: 13-22). In this Biblical instance we have a refutation of the doctrine held by the Roman Catholic Church––that Peter was the head of the church. Also, when Peter was miraculously released from prison he immediately instructed that James be notified of his release in Acts 12:17 thus indicating that James was the presiding elder of the church at Jerusalem.
BIBLICAL FACT 3. Peter was appointed Apostle to the Jews––the circumcision, as we read in Galatians 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; So here we clearly read that as Paul was appointed Apostle to the Gentiles, and Rome was a Gentile city––those of the uncircumcision, so Peter was the Apostle in charge of Jewish affairs––not the entire Christian church, and the Jews formed only a very small portion of the church. The converts from the Gentiles soon greatly outnumbered them..
In 51 A.D. Paul was in Antioch where he got into a dispute with Peter because he wouldn’t sit with the Gentiles––very strange indeed if he was bishop of Rome, which was a thoroughly Gentile city. Let us read about that in Galatians 2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. 12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. 13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. 14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?
Here Paul, who saw the wrong done the church through the double part acted by Peter openly rebukes him before the entire group. This again, as in the prior example, demonstrates that Peter in no way stood above the level of the other apostles, or that he was the head Apostle over all the church..
BIBLICAL FACT 4. It was Paul who originally formed the Church in Rome in 55 or 56 A.D. He wrote to the Christians there in Romans 1:11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established; If Peter had been instrumental in raising up or establishing a Christian congregation in Rome some years earlier, such a statement to the Romans, could only be interpreted as a massive personal insult to Peter if he was already the bishop of the church there. Of course such was not the case, for Paul wrote to the Christians in Rome in Romans 15:20 Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation: Another fact that we must not let escape us is that in the next chapter he sends greetings to a total of 28 individual people in Rome, but makes no mention of Peter. Why is this so if the apostle Peter was the head of the Church in Rome, was he determined to insult Peter and bring in division and discord, contrary to his many admonitions for church unity?
BIBLICAL FACT 5. When Paul was imprisoned in Rome, we read what occurred there: Acts 28:16 And when we came to Rome, the centurion delivered the prisoners to the captain of the guard: but Paul was suffered to dwell by himself with a soldier that kept him. 17 And it came to pass, that after three days Paul called the chief of the Jews together: and when they were come together, he said unto them, Men and brethren, though I have committed nothing against the people, or customs of our fathers, yet was I delivered prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans. 18 Who, when they had examined me, would have let me go, because there was no cause of death in me. 19 But when the Jews spake against it, I was constrained to appeal unto Caesar; not that I had ought to accuse my nation of. 20 For this cause therefore have I called for you, to see you, and to speak with you: because that for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain. 21 And they said unto him, We neither received letters out of Judaea concerning thee, neither any of the brethren that came shewed or spake any harm of thee. 22 But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect, we know that everywhere it is spoken against. 23 And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging; to whom he expounded and testified the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening.
Had Peter (a strongly partisan Jew) been Bishop of Rome for years prior to this time, these Jewish leaders would certainly have known the basics of the Christian faith, but they only knew that it was spoken against as a sect, and were totally ignorant of the teachings of Christianity, so Paul had to instruct them.
So here we have given five Biblical evidences that the Apostle Peter, who may or may not have been in Rome during these incidents, certainly was not looked upon or held in higher regard than the other church leaders during that period of the early Christian church––and certainly was NOT the head of the Roman Christian church, as is greatly heralded by the Catholic denomination. If ANYONE deserves to be considered as the foundation of the TRUE Christian church in Rome, all the BIBLICAL evidence supports that it is Paul, not Peter who should receive that honor. So since the Bible does not support this teaching, and we seek to know the truth––not legend, assumption or tradition––where else can we look? The only place left is in the ancient records of church and secular history. Let us go there.
The question remains then is who, in that case, was the Peter that the Catholic Church claims was the head of the church? Of one thing secular history is abundantly and undeniably clear: there WAS a “Simon Peter” in Rome during the middle part of the first century––and he did wield tremendous influence on the religious scene in the Gentile city. Can we find out who he was and where he came from?
Ancient history reveals that the pagan deities worshipped by the Babylonians and the Greeks were known as Patres or Peters: “Not only the gods but the Hierophatae [special gods], in most temples, and those priests in particular who were occupied in the celebration of the mysteries, were styled Patres” Bryant, Ancient Mythology, Vol. 1, p. 354. Davidson’s Hebrew Lexicon shows that the consonantal word P-T-R (Peter) means “to interpret.” The priests of the Babylonian and other mystery religions claimed to have the power to interpret the pagan mysteries.
In the Luceii Fragments, we find that the ancient Romans considered Neptune, Saturn, Mars and Liber as “gods” of Peter rank or chief gods, as opposed to lesser gods. When Simon Magus went to Rome he bewitched the inhabitants with his “magical” (demonic) powers and soon became known as Simon Peter––Simon the interpreter of the Babylonian Mysteries.
The encounter of Simon Magus the sorcerer, with the apostles is found in Acts 8: 9-24, and it is highly significant that it was the apostle Peter that rebuked and through the Holy Spirit pronounced judgment on him. Verse 23 states of Simon: For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. This is a prophecy! Peter knew the mind of this man and what was in his heart, regardless of the fact that he had been baptized. In the Greek the phrase means that Simon was a cause of bitterness and corruption to others, or literally, “I regard you as a man whose influence WILL BE like that of poison and a bond of lawlessness, or, as a man who has reached such a state.” He was telling what this Simon was to become, for he clearly knew that Simon wouldn’t repent.
The term “gall of bitterness” is adopted from the Old Testament (See Deuteronomy 29:16-18), which denoted going over to the idols and abominations of the heathen. When the apostle Peter applied the phrase to Simon Magus, he meant that Simon would be responsible for the introduction of heathen beliefs and idols into the Christian church. No wonder Jude later says in Jude 4: For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our1 God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. Was this prophetic pronouncement by the Apostle Peter truly justified or was it not? Let us see what history records.
When Justin Martyr (A converted philosopher and early church historian) wrote [152 A.D.] his Apology, the sect of the Simonians appears to have been formidable, for he speaks four times of their founder, Simon; and we need not doubt that he identified him with the Simon of the book of Acts, who did not sink into insignificance but went to Rome and became a primary antagonist against the true faith. He states that he was a Samaritan, as the Bible bears out (See Acts 8:9), adding that his birthplace was a village called Gitta; he describes him as a formidable magician, and tells that “he came to ROME in the days of Claudius Caesar (45 A.D.), and made such an impression by his magical powers, THAT HE WAS HONORED AS A GOD, a statue being erected to him on the Tiber, between the two bridges, bearing the inscription ‘Simoni deo Sancto’ (i.e., the holy god Simon)" (Dictionary of Christian Biography, Vol. 4, p. 682)..
That these things actually happened CANNOT BE DOUBTED! Justin was writing to the Roman people at the time and they could certainly have exposed Justin’s credulity if what he said was not so. And, that a statue of Simon was actually erected is definite, for Justin asked the authorities in Rome to destroy it! There are many writers, who lived in Rome itself, who afterwards repeated Justin’s account. Those who want to reject these clear statements have nothing in their favor. Justin is clearly giving us historical fact!
Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol 2, p. 496, states that there is "very slight evidence on which to reject so precise a statement as Justin makes; a statement he would scarcely have hazarded in an apology addressed to Rome, where every person had the means of ascertaining its accuracy. If he made a mistake, it must have been at once exposed, and other writers would not have frequently repeated the story as they have done." In other words, if Justin would have been lying about this, he would have been immediately exposed as doing so, but the facts still stand!
At the time of Claudius, it was illegal to erect a statue to any man as a god or greatly honored person unless the permission of the Emperor and the Senate had been secured. The statue was still standing in Justin’s day (152 A.D.), and people were still giving regard to it.
There are many other accounts of Simon’s traveling to Rome and becoming one of the great gods to the city and to the people of Rome. There are records which show that Simon "prophesies that Rome will be the scene of his crowning glory, when he will be adored as a god" (Dictionary of Religion & Ethics, Vol. 11, p. 522).
Later, about the fourth century, a flood of works came out about Peter encountering Simon Magus in Rome and overthrowing him. But these works are clearly fiction. Almost all scholars realize the absurdity of maintaining such a thing. It was NOT Simon Peter who went to Rome to become Apostle to the Gentiles. The renowned SIMON in Rome was SIMON MAGUS the sorcerer, NOT Simon Peter the Apostle!
That Peter the Apostle was not with Simon Magus in Rome is made plain by the Encyclopedia Biblica, col. 4554. "The attempt has been made to meet this by pointing out that church fathers mention the presence of SIMON (MAGUS) in Rome while at the same time NOT speaking of controversies between him and PETER (the apostle). This is indeed true of Justin [one of the earliest witnesses -- 152 A.D.] who knows nothing of any presence of Peter in Rome at all, as also of Irenaeus." (Another respected historian)
Not only did Justin feel that Peter was NOT in Rome at the time, but his deliberate silence shows he didn't want to perpetrate such fiction. After all, Justin lived very early in the history of the church, and the legend of the Apostle Peter’s being in Rome HAD NOT GOTTEN STARTED YET! Continuing with the Encyclopedia Biblica about Justin’s reference to SIMON MAGUS: "One part of this tradition -- that about Simon’s (Magus) presence in Rome -- he [Justin] found himself able to accept [in fact he held it to be confirmed by the statue, which he brought into connection with Simon]; the other -- that about Peter’ s (the apostle) presence in Rome -- he was unable to accept" (col. 4555).
Of course Justin was unable to accept the latter teaching. The fact is, if Simon Peter was in Rome, he was not plainly and visibly leading and directing a church! Simon Peter was a Jew and a foreigner––and they were not very well looked upon by the populace of Rome at that time. It was another Simon who was there making a name for himself––SIMON MAGUS, the one bringing "Christianity" to Rome in the guise of the old Babylonian mystery religions. Simon Magus came to Rome with the grand idea of establishing a UNIVERSAL RELIGION in the NAME of Christianity! And what is remarkable, he did just that!
We will next see how Simon Magus became later confused with Simon Peter and how he cleverly brought into "Christianity" the mystery religions of Babylon. Elevating his personal teachings above the Bible, and preaching a "no obedience–faith alone" doctrine of salvation Simon Magus soon had a universal, popular following.
SIMON Magus, just like his Samaritan forefathers, deliberately blended together the teachings of Babylon with Biblical phrases. One of his main intentions was to appropriate a Christian vocabulary to the Babylonian ceremonial system. In other words, he kept on with his heathenism, but now called his system "Christian" in origin. To legitimately introduce paganism into the Church he had to explain away many passages in the Old Testament, which forbade idolatry and contact with the abominations of the heathen. This he quite cleverly did. His primary method of explaining the Old Testament was to allegorize its teachings––in other words, he taught that it was all fables and symbolic metaphors.
If this weren’t sufficient to explain it away, he would repudiate it as being of less value than the present will of God that was supposedly being revealed to him. In fact, he got to the place of doing away altogether with the Old Testament by teaching that its doctrines were meant to enslave people and that its commandments were too grievous to bear. Irenaeus states that “Simon taught, that the Jewish prophecies [the Old Testament] were inspired by the creator angels; therefore, those who had hope in him and Helena (More about her later.) NEED NOT ATTEND TO THEM, BUT FREELY DO AS THEY WOULD; for that men should be saved according to his grace, and not by any intrinsic quality of their own, but by the accident of these being ordered by these creator angels WHO HAD MERELY WISHED TO ENSLAVE THOSE WHO HEARD THEM" (Dict. Of Christian Biography, vol. 4, p. 683). How diabolical and totally anti-biblical!
The Dictionary. of Religion and Ethics has this to say about this cardinal doctrine of SIMON PATER. "Simon taught that the precepts of the law and the prophets were inspired by angels [lesser beings] in the desire to reduce men to slavery, but those who believed in him and Helena, since they were delivered from the sinister tyranny of the law, were free to act as they would. ‘For men are saved by grace and not by good works.’ The antinomianism (justified by faith alone––therefore not bound to obey the law) of the Simonians became manifest in LIBERTINE (lewd and lascivious) conduct and A COMPROMISE WITH HEATHENISM" (vol. 11, p. 518).
Let’s go on. "But he [Simon] promised that the world should be dissolved, and that those who were his own should be redeemed. And accordingly, HIS PRIESTS,” Irenaeus tells us [yes, and this is VERY significant, Simon established a priesthood], “led lascivious lives, used magic and incantations, made philters (magic potions), HAD FAMILIAR SPIRITS by whose aid they were able to trouble with dreams those whom they would.” Ibid.
People who had supernatural, demonistic powers as Simon did were honoured as gods in the first century -- even sacrifices were offered to them. Does this seem unlikely? Then read Acts 14:11-13. After seeing the great miracles that Paul and Barnabas had done through the Holy Spirit, Luke says: "And when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker." Then the priest of Jupiter...would have done sacrifice with the people.
Paul and Barnabas "rent their clothes" at such action. What would SIMON MAGUS have done? Or rather, what did Simon Magus do? He let the Roman Senate with the approval of the Emperor Claudius deify him as a god and erect a statue to him. And, the people who followed SIMON called him JUPITER, at the same